"We are facing the big event", Spartak Ngjela makes the sensational prediction for Albania: It depends on Rama and ...
"Knives behind the back", Brace tells the reasons why he left the government and the clashes with Rama: There was no room for two
Well-known Italian journalist warns of China's scary plan that is alarming NATO: After Putin, here is the "earthquake" that will cause Xi Jinping
What is expected to happen? Spartak Ngjela issues 'bomb' warning
Albanian sport in mourning, the former volleyball player of the National Team (NAME) dies
Explosive with explosion in a hotel in Saranda, the first information is revealed
"It is a horror, only villas and palaces are built here", Brace bites Rama again for the cows
They manipulated the result of the April 25 elections in Elbasan, who are the CEAZ members who ended up in police custody
Cannibals with forks
Written by Ardi Stefa 20 Maj 2022
"If cannibals used forks, could we say that they have made some progress, they have evolved?" The answer to this question of a prominent Polish poet could spontaneously be: "It depends from what point of view, or from whom you see it!" On the cannibal side, of course it makes progress. As it improves the way of enjoying food and avoids dramatic contact with human flesh.
But on the part of the unfortunate victim, I have many doubts that there would be a positive assessment regarding this fact. The unbearable pain of being slaughtered, along with the last terrible possibility would weigh much more on assessing the situation than the modern way of dealing with this equally barbaric criminal act. For fanatical supporters of taxing everything, with the aim of state protection of all those who think and decide they are worthwhile, progress is not the abolition of slaughter, but the improvement of ways of destruction. Ruthlessly, the state, and its rulers, buy votes to stay in power. And sacrificing in this way, the income of hundreds of thousands of people, whose only sin, was to be born or live in the land of arrogant populists. The cannibals of our age ruin the lives and well-being of ordinary citizens without being punished. And for the fork, so that theft is not revealed in its true forms and dimensions, they likely use their interest and liking caring for the weak. At this point two main questions arise: The first has to do with who evaluates and how the weak are in reality. Second, it has to do with the right problematization, whether those monetary resources collected by the state from the income of the poor, take place and end up in the hands, or pockets of the poor. And in either case, the questions are numerous and the answers hesitant and vague. How exactly is the meaning of the poor and the weak valued in our age? Previously, the unemployed were considered weak, the wage worker, the poor farmer, and those citizens who depended day by day on state subsidies and social support. Today, these views have changed drastically. Someone who chooses not to work can not be considered "weak", as he estimates that he is more interested in receiving subsidies and social support without getting tired instead of working every day. Of course, even in today's societies it is not possible to distinguish social differentiations based on the economic categories of the past. The security of integration somewhere, today no longer exists. Roles are already confused and citizens as people function as nominees, constantly shifting from profession to dependent work, finding nowhere any port to cast anchor. Our era, then, is marked and can be considered the end of security. Marx based his theories on the need for capital to exploit free labor. Today capital no longer needs the unskilled worker. He throws it in the trash, further isolating it economically and socially. The problem today is not the exploitation of human toil and labor, but indifference to it. Who exactly is "poor" today is a particularly relative issue. In the time of the poor industrial age it was he who was unemployed. One who had no income at all and a stable job. Today, poverty is measured differently, based on the income it consumes, but also on the products it consumes. He may have an income, find a job, but feel "poor" because it is impossible to go a little further in a consumer society,
I varfër sot konsiderohet ai person i cili paguhet minimalisht në të bardhë dhe maksimalisht në të zezë, ndërkohë që shteti që e di këtë gjë nuk bën asgjë për t’i ardhur në ndihmë, jo qytetarit të shfrytëzuar, por ekzistencës së tij si shtet në të ardhmen, pasi nga taksat esigurimet do të ketë të ardhurat e mëvonshme për pagat, buxhetorët, pensionet, etj. I varfër sot mundet të konsiderohet edhe ai qytetar, i cili punon e paguan detyrimet sociale e shëndetësore, duke e ditur se pas disa vitesh për të nuk do të ketë pension, ose pensionet do të jenë aq qesharake, saqë ai nuk do të mundet të jetojë. I varfër mundet të konsiderohet me plot gojën edhe ai, i cili sipas reformave drastike në sistemin e sigurimeve, do të punojë gjithë jetën dhe s’do të arrijë të dalë në pension. Pasi, me të vërtetë fjalët janë të bukura dhe reformat duket se janë të domosdoshme, por përvojat kanë treguar se të ardhurat që jepen për të “varfërit” rrallëherë përfundojnë në shërbim apo në të mirë të objektivave për të cilat u morën! Pasi disa mësojnë të rrojnë me këto para dhe përpiqen që të mos ndahen prej tyre. Kanibalët, pra, vazhdojnë të shpojnë ushqimin e tyre. Vetëm se duke përdorur pirunë që i paraqesin si evolucion, ndërkohë që ende qëndrimin e tyre e kanë të pandryshuar, kanibal dhe fiksimin e tyre po aq kanibal.