BREAKING NEWS

How Meta-Kryemadhi became millionaires during 30 years in politics, here are the untold stories of the couple who married in power and divorced in opposition, from the luxurious villa with 11 toilets, the palm trees that were brought by helicopter, the...

How Meta-Kryemadhi became millionaires during 30 years in politics, here are the
x
BREAKING NEWS

SPAK issues 19 arrest warrants for Tirana's incinerator, the list includes high-ranking officials, politicians, media leaders and their families, the details of the big operation are disclosed

SPAK issues 19 arrest warrants for Tirana's incinerator, the list includes
x
BREAKING NEWS

Does the UDB agency connect Sali Berisha and Baton Haxhiu, this is how the former prime minister defended the analyst for the villa in Golem who is being investigated by SPAK and "swallowed" all the slanderous accusations that they have exchanged with ...

Does the UDB agency connect Sali Berisha and Baton Haxhiu, this is how the
x
BREAKING NEWS

Sali Berisha did not have a mandate according to the Constitution, the head of the DP makes way for Argita and prepares to crown his daughter on the throne with the July 12 protest, Gaz Bardhi ends up as a "squeezed lemon"

Sali Berisha did not have a mandate according to the Constitution, the head of
x
BREAKING NEWS

The incinerators' money guarantees Arben Ahmetaj's life on the run, here are the transfers of hundreds of thousands of euros by Albanian taxpayers to Swiss offshores, SPAK reveals that the businessman who is helping him in Lugano is accused of money la...

The incinerators' money guarantees Arben Ahmetaj's life on the run,
x
BREAKING NEWS

Belinda Balluku "mountain" with reports to SPAK, here are all the scandals in which the deputy prime minister is involved, from investigations into incinerators, corrupt tenders, contracts, privatizations and up to scandalous firms for giving public lands

Belinda Balluku "mountain" with reports to SPAK, here are all the
x
BREAKING NEWS

Strong developments within SPAK, the prosecutors extend the investigation deadlines for Arben Ahmetaj by 3 months and send summons to the oligarch who is accused of money laundering

Strong developments within SPAK, the prosecutors extend the investigation
x
BREAKING NEWS

Spartak Ngjela reveals the "bombastic" behind-the-scenes: This is why the divorce of Ilir Meta and Monika Kryemadhi cannot save them from the shackles and the strong reason that DASH senior official Richard Nephew avoided meetings in Tirana with the 'R...

Spartak Ngjela reveals the "bombastic" behind-the-scenes: This is why
x

Opinion / Editorial

That there was an "Old Woman" in Kamnik and "some daughters" there was not heard before, a forced answer for Mr. Sami Dake

That there was an "Old Woman" in Kamnik and "some daughters"

I hear this "Old Dodona" for the first time from Mr. Sami Dake from Cologne in what he expresses as his personal opinion in the newspaper "SOT" dated June 21 of this year. It is like a reply, or an invitation to debate, which has as its object my name for the article about the book "The truth about Dodona and Epirus" by Kujtim Matelin, published by this newspaper on June 3 of this year. No one forbids someone to ask you for a response, or to invite a debate, but I am not able to understand why this commitment is lacking in this case? Do you want me and Kujtimi to talk necessarily about what Mr. Sami writes, or about the ones I presented? That, from what he says, he was not happy that we did not remember to talk about the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik in Cologne and the study of the corresponding researcher for this purpose, while I had personally heard the name Kamnik, but never the name, "Old Dodona"! Then, I talk about the value of Kujtim Mateli's study, that I have been able to read that study, and it has a different meaning than what Mr. Sami presented in the June 21 article. But in the end, I could write about that too, if I had the right knowledge. Anyway, I want to, I don't want to, I will try to say a few words in the following. His entire writing speaks precisely about the "Old Dodona" that was found in Kamnik, which according to him, "started 300 thousand years ago and became visible 50 thousand years later...". How long he extends the existence of Dodona in time, but this is a matter that only he, with whom he speaks of "Old Dodona", can know. While what the world knows, it is far beyond the time of "shaving". Nevertheless, I can say to Mr. Sami: "well done, my friend, for the discovery you have made...and many more achievements!" No, I don't, but not even in Mr. Mateli's four books about Dodona, have I seen him refer to Dodona as "Old Woman" or "Mother" that Mr. Sami speaks of, nor to his name as a researcher. Apparently, he will not be fully aware, or that study does not fill his mind. In the end, what is the importance of the fact that I and Kujtimi have not spoken out about the "discoveries of Kamnik", when they, as Samiu says, "were evaluated by our Academy of Sciences", which waited "until the event matures", he emphasizes. And I would add, the island comes out "roasted" and far from being "burnt"! Then, for the sake of humanity, I want to clarify that as long as I did not know anything about Mr. Sami's discovery, I had no reason to speak. This is the same as saying, did Mr. Sami remember to say a few words of solidarity for Mr. Mateli's study? I do not believe. What about getting to know one of his publications (especially this last one), didn't curiosity push him even for reciprocity? I do not know. If I came up with an article for the book of Remembrance, I was convinced by the theme and content. Good or bad, believe it or not, is another matter. I don't force anyone to say "Amen" to me. But I don't have to enter the debate when I don't feel like it. Thus, neither can I stop the other to remain silent, nor can I force him to speak because I want him to.Then, why did I want to argue with Mr. Sami, when I have not spoken a word about what he claims? In any case, things have an acceptable logic. But as far as I can see from what he says in his writing, Mr. Sami did not have much (if not at all) idea of ??where the "hammer" of Memory beats in what he has accomplished. Even, not so much for "Dodona bije" in Dëshnica. Otherwise, Sami wouldn't have said: "You're doing very well to study the new Dodonas...". While below it says: "Accept it publicly and express yourself clearly, researchers of Dodona, for whom do you spend time writing?". I don't know where he found the term "New Dodons" and where he got the inspiration when he says: "for whom Dodo and time do you write...?". That, in Mr. Mateli's books, there is no word about "New Dodona" or "Old Dodona". He only talks about a Dodona, the one officially recognized by the whole world until now, whose author is the Greek Karapanos, confirmed in 1878 and claimed in Carakoviste near Ioannina, who, as I quoted in the first article, "saw it with the eyes of his and Ismail Qemali". I don't say this, but Prof. M. Korkuti. And the author in question (K. Mateli), makes historical arguments based on the statements of ancient authors, that the finding of Karapano, even though he received the identifying "passport" about 150 years ago, is simply a fraud, not based on it truth. So, this author does not deal with Dodona the old woman or Dodona the daughter, nor with that of Kamnik nor with that of Tomorri, as someone from the Osum river does. He came to the matter directly, putting it to bed face to face: what Karapanos and other Greeks found and said about the only Dodona that the world had (I mentioned the place) and what dozens of historians, geographers and others have said scholars about it, starting from the location, the ethnicity it represents, the deity that was believed in Dodona, the Pelazgo-Illyrian tribes where it was located, the river and the mountain Tomar (and how this name has evolved ending in Trebešina), the rustling oaks, the findings of figurines, orientation maps, the possibility of visiting it as a temple of time, etc. Even the physical appearance and clothing of the people of Dodona and any of their musical instruments. Let's not forget the most basic thing, that the authors of antiquity have defined Dodona as part of the Mollos tribes in Epirus, excluding its being in Illyria. Thus, even the tendency of some to give Dodona a place on the top of Mount Tomorri, where the Bektashian Tomb of Abbas Ali is located, or on the top of other mountains, is not valid. To say the least, Mount Tomorri is quite far from the border where Epirus lies! Then, according to ancient authors, the temple of Dodona could be visited at any time, while the tops of the mountains, such as that of Tomorri, do not fulfill this condition. Anyone who wants to get acquainted with these arguments, should at least get acquainted with his latest book "Dodona and the truth about Epirus", a publication reviewed by 5 respected professors of Albania and Kosovo, known as historians,linguists and ethnographers, who have also made appropriate evaluations in favor of the author. This is also the main source on which I based that article. Then, whether or not you agree with what Mr. Mateli and the relevant reviewers say, is a matter of individual taste. And this has nothing to do with what someone will say, that Kujtim Mateli puts Dodona in Dëshnica because he is from that province. This could hardly have escaped the 5 reviewers, if it was at all true. He presents the thesis that, the height where the Illyrian Castle is located on the slope of the Trebeshina mountain, very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects cited above, meet the reasonable conditions to be excavated, Dodona and antiquity, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that country. There is a thesis that must be proven by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just to avoid discussing the "leadership" of Kamnik. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)who have also made appropriate evaluations for the author. This is also the main source on which I based that article. Then, whether or not you agree with what Mr. Mateli and the relevant reviewers say, is a matter of individual taste. And this has nothing to do with what someone will say, that Kujtim Mateli puts Dodona in Dëshnica because he is from that province. This could hardly have escaped the 5 reviewers, if it was at all true. He presents the thesis that, the height where the Illyrian Castle is located on the slope of the Trebeshina mountain, very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects cited above, meet the reasonable conditions to be excavated, Dodona and antiquity, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that country. There is a thesis that must be proven by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't succeeded with this aunt, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)who have also made appropriate evaluations for the author. This is also the main source on which I based that article. Then, whether or not you agree with what Mr. Mateli and the relevant reviewers say, is a matter of individual taste. And this has nothing to do with what someone will say, that Kujtim Mateli puts Dodona in Dëshnica because he is from that province. This could hardly have escaped the 5 reviewers, if it was at all true. He presents the thesis that, the height where the Illyrian Castle is located on the slope of the Trebeshina mountain, very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects cited above, meet the reasonable conditions to be excavated, Dodona and antiquity, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that country. There is a thesis that must be proven by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention Karapano's "discovery" and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, as long as Karapano denies the existence of Dodona in ancient times in an arboreal land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just to avoid discussing the "leadership" of Kamnik. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)This is also the main source on which I based that article. Then, whether or not you agree with what Mr. Mateli and the relevant reviewers say, is a matter of individual taste. And this has nothing to do with what someone will say, that Kujtim Mateli puts Dodona in Dëshnica because he is from that province. This could hardly have escaped the 5 reviewers, if it was at all true. He presents the thesis that, the height where the Illyrian Castle is located on the slope of the Trebeshina mountain, very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects cited above, meet the reasonable conditions to be excavated, Dodona and antiquity, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that country. There is a thesis that must be proven by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who has "discovered" Karapanos, agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't succeeded with this aunt, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)This is also the main source on which I based that article. Then, whether or not you agree with what Mr. Mateli and the relevant reviewers say, is a matter of individual taste. And this has nothing to do with what someone will say, that Kujtim Mateli puts Dodona in Dëshnica because he is from that province. This could hardly have escaped the 5 reviewers, if it was at all true. He presents the thesis that, the height where the Illyrian Castle is located on the slope of the Trebeshina mountain, very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects cited above, meet the reasonable conditions to be excavated, Dodona and antiquity, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that country. There is a thesis that must be proved by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who has "discovered" Karapanos, agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)And this has nothing to do with what someone will say, that Kujtim Mateli puts Dodona in Dëshnica because he is from that province. This could hardly have escaped the 5 reviewers, if it was at all true. He presents the thesis that, the height where the Illyrian Castle is located on the slope of the Trebeshina mountain, very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects cited above, meet the reasonable conditions to be excavated, Dodona and antiquity, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that country. There is a thesis that must be proved by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention Karapano's "discovery" and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, as long as Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)And this has nothing to do with what someone will say, that Kujtim Mateli puts Dodona in Dëshnica because he is from that province. This could hardly have escaped the 5 reviewers, if it was at all true. He presents the thesis that, the height where the Illyrian Castle is located on the slope of the Trebeshina mountain, very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects cited above, meet the reasonable conditions to be excavated, Dodona and antiquity, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that country. There is a thesis that must be proved by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "jigisij" who is Dodona Plka of Kamnik, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who has "discovered" Karapanos, agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects that are cited above, meet the reasonable conditions that if excavated, the ancient Dodona, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that place. There is a thesis that must be proved by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention Karapano's "discovery" and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, as long as Karapano denies the existence of Dodona in ancient times in an arboreal land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just to avoid discussing the "leadership" of Kamnik. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)very close to the rivers Vjosa and Dëshnica and the city of Këlcyra, or other aspects that are cited above, meet the reasonable conditions that if excavated, the ancient Dodona, the only one known on the planet, would belong to that place. There is a thesis that must be proved by excavations. But even if it is not confirmed there tomorrow, Kujtim Mateli has already confirmed that Dodona of Carakovita, near Ioannina, was mistakenly "baptized" there. So it does not belong to that country. It is also argued that her ethnicity is Pelazgo-Illyrian and that she is in an arboreal land, not a Hellenic one. However, I would like to say that Mr. Dake does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who has "discovered" Karapanos, agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't succeeded with this aunt, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just to avoid discussing the "leadership" of Kamnik. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)does not deal with this issue at all. It goes in the direction of what Mr. Mateli intends with the study of Dodona. He doesn't even mention the "discovery" of Karapano and take a certain stance, if not as a researcher, at least as an Albanian, while Karapano denies the existence of ancient Dodona in the wooded land as well as its Pelazgo-Illyrian ethnicity. This is more basic than wasting time on which is "Any Mother" and which is "Any Daughter"! Thus, it would be better for Mr. Dake to congratulate Mr. Mateli for his commitment, courage and arguments, than to ask for a debate "why don't you talk about my Dodona". The "old woman" of Kamnik. He does not do this (and in the end, no one necessarily asks him to), because from what is understood from what he presents, his whole preoccupation is not to "giggle" who Dodonan Plka of Kamnik is, to make him the most valued on this and even Dodo on Dodon. I say this because he is for "plurality of Dodona": old women, mothers, women, daughters, old and young (he didn't even say "grandmother" for nothing), and the one who should "reign" over them should be "Dodona" Mother of Kamnik". In a word, Mr. Sami Dake, or the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just to avoid discussing the "leadership" of Kamnik. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't made it this aunty, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)or you find the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't succeeded with this aunt, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)or you find the being of Dodona who "discovered" Karapanos agrees with your deceptions; either he does not want to clash with his study for the reasons he may know, or he agrees with Dodona being there, but without harming the "Old Dodona" of Kamnik. All this, just so that the "leadership" of Kamnik is not discussed. Let her be in charge. If he still hasn't succeeded with this aunt, I hope it goes his way. Don't worry about that "daughter" of Dëshnica. Here's what I had to say in this case, not so much willingly, but more in respect of Mr. Sami, whom I don't know, but we are good neighbors: Through Kolonje. (Tirana, June 24, 2024.)