Changing the regulation, the well-known MP mocks the government: the majority today only with the votes of renaissance, while yesterday with consensus

The vice-chairman of the Freedom Party, Petrit Vasili, commented on the vote to change the Parliament's regulations.

According to Vasili, the majority is voting on everything by itself.

Through a post on the social network 'Facebook', Vasili adds that these changes in the Rules of the Assembly by Rama and Renaissance, since they have a direct impact on the type and severity of disciplinary measures, which weigh on the parliamentary Opposition, must necessarily have the widest possible consensus.

Vasili's full post:

Changing the Rules, the majority today only with the votes of the renaissance, while the majority yesterday was by consensus!

Prior to 2013, the majority changed the Regulation only by consensus.

This is so true that everyone remembers well that one of the three laws conditions for European integration and the opening of negotiations for membership, which Edi Rama blocked because of the Chairman of the Fier District, was precisely the Regulation of the Assembly and the approval by consensus of her.

While today the yesterday's renaissance opposition, currently the HHH majority (horra, thieves, hajna) is changing the Regulation only with its votes, turning this act with constitutional values ??into a stinking regulation of the party of Edi Rames.

REGULAR CONSTITUTIONAL WEIGHT:

The Constitutional Court in its Decision no. 21/2008, among other things, evaluates the Regulation of the Assembly and says:

"The regulation of the Assembly is an act, the reserved source of constitutional law that disciplines the procedure for the development of the work of the Assembly, the internal organization, the relations between the Assembly itself as a whole of its internal organisms, its relations with other constitutional bodies etc".

"A part of the provisions of the Regulation are in content the same as the constitutional provisions, while some others are executive norms of the constitutional norms, that is, which determine the rules on how the constitutional norms are implemented".

----------------------------------------------------- --------------------

CONCLUSION:

These changes in the Rules of the Assembly on the part of Rames and Renaissance, since they have a direct impact on the type and weight of the disciplinary masavd, which weigh on the parliamentary Opposition, must necessarily have the widest possible consensus.

As otherwise these changes are clearly turned into an aggressive mechanism in the hands of the majority, to stifle and annihilate the opposition voice and any voice against the majority, through extreme disciplinary punitive measures, with the exception of some early ones with 2-month periods, from the works of parliament.

To make matters worse, the body that has the power to deal with and decide these disciplinary measures, which is the Secretariat of Ethics, which is totally in the hands of the majority, then these changes are a clear violation of the will of the sovereign, defined in the Constitution, by directly affected the continuity and the duration of the mandate of the deputy benefited by the free vote of the people.

These amendments to the Rules of the Assembly urgently introduced by Edi Rama, and to respond to the opposition reaction, are flagrant repressive measures that violate the rights of the opposition as well as violate and exceed the goals of the Constitution, provided for in Article 4 point 2, 70 point 1, 71, and 73 point 1, 75 point 2, of the Constitution.

The change of the two majorities is like night and day. This criminalized and incriminated majority hates the constitution and political dialogue and votes only to change the Regulation. While the majority before 2013, respecting the constitutional principles, tradition and dialogue, voted by consensus.